Several have commented, but I have not seen a diary focusing on HRC's comments about elitism and Gore/Kerry. I bring them here to highlight a point about the differences between HRC and BHO.
Politico has the note: http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0 408/Clinton_Out_of_touch_and_like_Gore.h tml
First Clinton. At the Compassion Forum this evening, in a disturbing attempt to paint Obama as elitist, she brings up the previous election cycles of Gore and Kerry.
"We had two very good men, and men of faith, run for president in 2000 and 2004," she said. "Large segments of the electorate concluded that they did not really understand, or relate to, or respect their ways of life."
Wow. She takes a swipe at Gore and Kerry in order to propagate her own talking point about Obama. Sounds an awful lot like the typical Republican talking points...and it feeds DIRECTLY into the Republican attack machine that has been waged against Dems since WJC ran in 1992. And dont think The Clintons are immune to the right-wing 'elitism' slam. Why on earth would she do that?
Now...how does Obama respond:
"Al Gore was mentioned earlier. I think Al Gore won," Obama said.
Now that is a Democratic talking point. Gore won.
Does HRC even remember which side she is on anymore - or has her tunnel vision propelled her to a point where she can no longer distinguish the good from the bad...the blue from the red, as it were. Her alignment with the McCain camp is equally distressing. She is attacking Obama ALONGSIDE McCain. Will she ever stop?
I can tell you one thing...that Gore endorsement just got a little closer.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 41 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.